How Oak Homes Limited failed to provide apartments after paying N152m: Engineer

Gbenga Odunsi
4 Min Read
Disclosure: This website may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. I only recommend products or services that I personally use and believe will add value to my readers. Your support is appreciated!
Mr. Olukayode Olusanya

A Nigerian-American engineer, Mr. Anthony Ugbebor, has opened his defence in a protracted N152 million property dispute at the Lagos State High Court, Tafawa Balewa Square, insisting he paid for two luxury flats with his “life savings,” only for the developer to later deny having records of the transaction.

The lawsuit, filed by property developer Mr. Olukayode Olusanya and his company, Oak Homes Limited (Suit No. LD/4471LM/2023), seeks a declaration of trespass and other reliefs against Ugbebor over two second-floor apartments at No. 14A Musa Yar’Adua Street, Victoria Island, Lagos.

When proceedings resumed, Ugbebor, through his counsel Mr. Nasiru Salau, adopted his witness statement on oath, leading to the admission of several documents as Exhibits DW1 A–J.

Presiding over the case, Justice Akingbola George allowed Ugbebor to introduce evidence in support of his amended counterclaim, urging the court to dismiss the claimant’s suit for lacking merit and to order the immediate handover of the two flats, which he said he had substantially paid for since 2020.

The engineer testified that he paid N152 million (equivalent to $400,000) out of a total purchase price of N190 million (80% paid) using his “life savings.”

He stated that on October 11, 2022, he sent a representative to inspect the flats, only for Oak Homes Limited to allegedly claim there was “no record” of his transaction despite the payments made.

During cross-examination by the claimant’s counsel, Mr. Adeleke Agboola (SAN), Ugbebor confirmed he had filed a petition with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in Abuja after suspecting fraud.

He noted that Olusanya was detained following the report but refused to accept repayment, demanding the delivery of the flats instead.

The matter, later classified as civil, was also reported to the police at Zone 2 Command.

READ ALSO:  Tinubu has been fair to all sections of Nigeria – FG govt lists projects in Southeast, Southwest, others

Ugbebor acknowledged that part of a charge relating to threats to his life had been struck out by a court.

He further reported the case to the Department of State Services (DSS), citing threats to his personal safety.

He denied sending correspondence to the Ghana chapter of Transparency International labeling Olusanya a murderer or thief, stating he only expressed concern over Olusanya receiving an award despite perceived lack of integrity.

Ugbebor confirmed a contract for the two second-floor flats, originally scheduled for delivery by February 28, 2019, a deadline that was not met.

He confirmed that the Lagos State Government had sealed the project site in 2019 and that the COVID-19 pandemic and rising construction costs affected the development, though these factors did not justify non-delivery.

He recounted that the first meeting with all parties occurred on August 28, 2023, at the EFCC’s Abuja office, where Olusanya allegedly informed attendees that the two flats had been sold, despite Ugbebor having paid Oak Homes Limited N152 million out of N190 million between November 2017 and December 2020.

READ ALSO:  Tinubu Presides Over FEC Meeting, Inaugurates Law Reform Chair, Commissioner (Video)

Ugbebor said he was repeatedly notified by estate agents of attempts by the claimant (Olusanya) to sell each of the two flats at inflated prices: N310 million in January 2024, N360 million in February 2024, and N560 million in December 2024.

He insisted that his two flats had not been sold.

Responding to claims by Agboola (SAN) that he had agreed to a partial refund, which included N102 million already returned, Ugbebor described the allegation as “absolutely false,” noting he was in New York at the time and had not authorised any refund.

He emphasised that his primary interest was receiving the two flats, not a repayment.

SHARE THIS:
Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply