Court fixes October 31 for jurisdiction ruling on Dagogo’s suit against Tinubu

Chukwuma Okeke
3 Min Read
Disclosure: This website may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. I only recommend products or services that I personally use and believe will add value to my readers. Your support is appreciated!

The Federal High Court in Abuja has scheduled October 31, 2025, to deliver its ruling on the issue of jurisdiction in a suit filed by former House of Representatives member Farah Dagogo, challenging President Bola Tinubu’s constitutional authority to suspend democratically elected officials during the declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State.

The suit, No. FHC/PH/CS/50/2025, lists as defendants the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Senate President Godswill Akpabio, the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Speaker of the House of Representatives Tajudeen Abbas, and Vice Admiral Ibok Ete Ibas (Rtd.), who served as the Rivers State Administrator during the emergency rule period.

READ ALSO:  One killed, others abducted as bandits attack farmland in Kaduna

At Friday’s hearing, counsel to the plaintiff, Babafemi Adegbite, adopted his written arguments supporting the court’s jurisdiction to entertain the matter.

Presiding judge, Justice James Omotosho, after taking submissions from both parties, reserved his ruling and adjourned the matter until October 31.

- Advertisement -

Speaking to journalists after the proceedings, Adegbite reiterated his client’s stance that President Tinubu exceeded his constitutional powers by suspending elected officials in both the executive and legislative arms of the Rivers State Government.

READ ALSO:  Imo: Police rescue two children from trafficking syndicates

He said, “Even though they have now been reinstated, the action remains unconstitutional. We need a clear judicial pronouncement to prevent future occurrences.”

Adegbite maintained that the reinstatement of the affected officials does not make the case academic, noting that the core issue revolves around constitutional integrity and the scope of presidential power.

He further distinguished Dagogo’s suit from previous emergency rule cases that were struck out for lack of jurisdiction, insisting that the facts and legal issues in this case are different.

READ ALSO:  NCS, stakeholders urge Gov Eno to inaugurate Advisory Committee on Non-Custodial Measures

“We made the court understand that our case is clearly distinguishable from those dismissed earlier.

“After adopting our submissions, the court reserved judgment until October 31,” he said.

Originally filed at the Port Harcourt Division of the Federal High Court, the case was later transferred to the Abuja Division following a directive from the Attorney General of the Federation to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court.

SHARE THIS:
Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply